Thursday, November 5, 2009

Coco Chanel & WWII: An Unfashionable Ensemble

She may have created the Little Black Dress, but Coco Chanel also had a decidedly black past. Many critics have expressed outrage over the fact that in the recent flurry of films released about the life of Coco Chanel (Coco Before Chanel, Coco Chanel & Igor Stravinsky, and the television movie Coco Chanel), not one of them makes mention of Chanel's life during WWII, when she was reputedly involved in a relationship with a Nazi officer and was perhaps a Nazi sympathizer (possibly even a Nazi agent) and renowned Anti-Semite.

Of course, one might also argue that Chanel was simply experiencing a momentary lack of judgment; a mere case of temporary insanity, and just doing what she needed to do to survive; that she herself was not in fact of the pro-Aryan persuasion and only appeared that way outwardly in order to outlive the war that had taken her beloved Paris by storm. So was Coco really a survivor? Or was she just an opportunist?

To shed some light on the subject, let’s take a look at Chanel’s earlier years. She was born on August 19, 1883 in the small city of Saumur, Maine-et-Loire, France to a poor family. She lost her mother when she was only twelve years old, and her father sent her and her sister to live in the orphanage of the Catholic monastery of Aubazine, where she learned to sew. When she was old enough to leave the orphanage, she found work as a seamstress and began singing at La Rotunde nightclub, where she gained her nickname “Coco” for her husky-voiced performances of the song “Ko Ko Ri Ko”. Coco later became the mistress of millionaire Étienne Balsan and began selling her hats to the sophisticated cosmopolitan crowd of social climbers, singers, artists, and actors who frequented Balsan’s parties, ingraciating herself among his circle of elite friends. The French admired Chanel’s brazen avante-gard attitude toward fashion and thought of her as the moden-day fairytale; a true life rags to riches success story of a woman who would do anything she had to do in order to get ahead.

Apparently, “anything” did not exclude taking as her lover a high-ranking Nazi officer, one Hans Gunther von Dincklage, whom some speculate Chanel was dating in order to maintain her home at the Paris Ritz Carlton, which the Nazis made their official headquarters during their occupation of Paris. The affair led Chanel’s biographers and critics to wonder if Chanel was in fact a German agent. Perhaps the most bizarre yet compelling aspect of this theory was her reported role in a plot fittingly titled Operation Modellhut. With the end of the war in sight and the Germans, in all probability, ostensibly coming out on the losing end, the SS planned to have Chanel utilize her connections within society to secretly meet with Winston Churchill and negotiate a peace agreement on behalf of her Nazi friends. Operation Modellhut failed, and Chanel was arrested for war crimes. When questioned by French interrogators about her relationship with Hans Gunther von Dincklage, she replied, “Really, sir, a woman of my age cannot be expected to look at his passport if she has a chance of a lover.” The typical punishment for women accused of abetting Nazis during the War was to have their heads shaved and then be paraded through the streets, a punishment which Chanel narrowly avoided only by Churchill’s intervention on her behalf, which resulted in her release. She fled to Switzerland and did not return to Paris until almost a decade later.

While all signs point to “yay,” one tiny fact leads me to believe that Chanel did not truly harbor anti-semetic sentiments: her longstanding business partnership with the French Jewish businessman Pierre Wertheimer. Chanel relied upon Wertheimer's business connections and financial support in order to launch her perfume line in 1924, and I doubt that of all the wealthy men in the world who happened to also have a knack for business she would have picked a Jewish man to head up her company were she truly a subscriber of anti-semetic philosophy. But she did allow the opportunistic side to get the better of her once she became famous enough to no longer need the once sought-after financial backing Wertheimer could so amply provide.

In an underhanded attempt at exploiting Nazi pro-Aryan laws, during the German occupation of France she actually tried to use the laws banning Jews from owning businesses to her own advantage and "exterminate" Wertheimer from her perfume franchise. As per their initial business agreement, Wertheimer owned a whopping 70% of Parfums Chanel, while Chanel herself owned a mere 10% (Theophile Bader, the man who introduced the two back in 1922, owned the remaining 20%). Wertheimer had fled to America to escape the Nazis, and Chanel took his leave of absence as the ideal opportunity for her to seek majority control of the perfume sector of her business. Her attempt failed, as Wertheimer hired an Aryan proxy to run his business in France while he was away overseas.

So which one was she, a survivor or an opportunist? Chanel was never at risk for her life, and the Germans had no intention of destroying Paris, which they viewed as too beautiful to annihilate. That was never their mission, as it was in London. While Chanel personally may not have enthusiastically or maliciously sought out the deaths of over 6 million Jews during the Holocaust, she certainly did not resist German influence, nor did she turn away Nazi company from her bed. Chanel does not appear to have been a survivor as much as she was a woman who bent to the will of whomever had the most power at the time—The Nazis are taking over my beloved Ritz?! Time to find myself a German boyfriend. Germany may actually lose this war? Time to call up my old buddy Churchill!—even if that meant unscrupulously compromising her integrity.

One just might have hoped that as a woman who defied convention and made a name for herself by spurning the norm, uttering the words, “The most courageous act is still to think for yourself aloud,” that Coco Chanel herself would have found the courage to follow her own good advice.



Sources: Chanel and Her World by Edmonde Charles-Roux, The Chicago Tribune - "10 things you might not know about WWII", The Times - "Chanel and the Nazis", Fashion Model Directory - Chanel, The Dynamics of Fashion, 2nd Edition by Elaine Stone.

16 lovely comments:

Christine Trent said...

I have to admit, I knew absolutely nothing about the Chanel perfume empire prior to this post. How fascinating! Based on what you write, I'm guessing that Coco was a little bit of each: opportunistic and survivor.

Allie, you have some of the most interesting topics on your blog! That's why I visit you every day. :)

Ingrid Mida said...

What a thought provoking and well-written analysis you have presented.
My Dior book giveaway post is up.

Leslie Carroll said...

Allie, this is an exceptionally well written, analytical, informative, and provocate post. And I thank you for following up on your film review and expanding the discussion that began on that comment thread to include the darker side of the woman who made the "little black dress" a fashion icon and staple of our wardrobes.

As a Jew, my knee-jerk reaction is to condemn her for her associations during the Vichy years in France. I am sure the details of her life and interrelationships with lovers and business partners was more complicated than any biographer or historian's summation of events, because we can't know what was going on in her mind at the time other than her survival, personally and professionally. Even if she left diaries (did she?) she was always so keenly aware of having an audience that those might be skewed as well.

Regardless of what everyone else in France might have been doing at the time (and I have the utmost respect for the courageous few who comprised the French Resistance) I find Chanel's scruples and lack of moral fiber unforgiveable given what was known, even at the time, of the Nazis' wholesale extermination of the Jews and their overarching political plans for Europe.

And unfortunately, as much as I adore France -- its art, architecture, culture, fashion, and cuisine, the French have been historically anti-Semitic since the Middle Ages. So part of Chanel's outlook might have been quite similar or simpatico with many of her countrymen and women at the time.

Still, for me personally, I can't excuse it.

Jo-Jo said...

Wow...thanks for sharing this great information. I really did not have any knowledge of Coco Chanel's anti-semtic tendencies, but I think I will make a point to watch that movie soon.

Ms. Lucy said...

Woah! What an incredibly informative post- Fabulous! I love Coco- but unfortunately that anti-Jew sentiment that was so prevalent in France does a little more than tint her image (and I don't mean that in the fashion sense either). She did have choices but at the time it seems apparent that advancement was the only thing prevailing her motives; proof- she has become a legendary icon because she was an artistic genious who stopped at nothing. I admire her for defintely being a pioneer in the field and this certainly set the stage for women's advancement. Excellent post- Thanks:)

Allie ~ Hist-Fic Chick said...

Christine, you are such a doll (pun intended!)!! I am blushing :) I read the Edmonde Charles-Roux biography of Chanel a couple of years ago and was equally surprised by all of this fascinating, but appalling, info. After I posted my Coco Before Chanel movie review, Leslie and I got into a discussion (see the comments section of that post) about Coco during WWII, so I decided to write a piece on it to expand further on this controversial side to Chanel's life, which seems to have been conveniently left out of all the recent movies about her. I’m so glad you enjoyed reading it.

Thanks Ingrid! I had a feeling you might find this post interesting, given our mutual passion for fashion. And I entered your great Dior giveaway as soon as I saw your comment!!

Leslie, thank you for all of your compliments on my writing! I am so honored—as I said to Christine, you all are making me blush!

My father's step-father was a Colonel in WWII. "Uncle Herb," as he was known in my family, actually took photographs inside the gas chambers after they liberated one of the concentration camps in Germany—I’m not sure specifically which one, I’d have to ask my grandma—because he was so convinced that years later some loony would try to deny the existence of the Holocaust (enter Ahmadinejad stage left...). He was one of the Colonels who planned D-Day and was also asked to be one of the judges of the Nuremberg trials (he declined). Uncle Herb wasn't Jewish, but he was so affected by the war that he banned any German-made goods from making their way inside my dad's childhood home. I also have Jewish blood in my ancestry, in fact my great-great-grandpa and -grandma were murdered during the pogroms in Russia simply because they were Jews. There was recently a show on the History Channel called "The Rise of the Fourth Reich," about the SS officers who escaped the Nuremberg trials and created a secret society that still exists today, and it scared the wits out of me.

So, especially given all of my family history, I too have zero tolerance for bigoted anti-semitism. I don’t excuse Chanel for her actions, but at the same time, I don’t necessarily assume that she was definitely an Anti-Semite based on her relationship with the Nazi officer either—wishful thinking, perhaps, but I don’t take this as solid proof. I’ve heard rumors that she was immensely homophobic, too, but again that may have just been hearsay, which is why I didn’t include that bit in the post. I wasn’t there, so I can’t judge her situation solely based on what her biographers say about her (we all know just how unreliable second hand sources can be…). I do think she was an opportunist and that she contributed to society in many other ways (i.e. as a feminist and an artist), and while I wish she had found within herself the courage to follow her own good advice (to think for oneself), she obviously was severely lacking in the moral fiber department, and I can’t say that I would have expected the woman who brought us bell bottoms to have been leading the Resistance forces in her spare time. Coco Chanel as a person was immensely hypocritical—a woman who rebelled against convention, yet went with the flow politically once France was overtaken by the Nazis. She was what I like to call a living paradox.

Allie ~ Hist-Fic Chick said...

Jo-Jo, I so enjoyed Coco Before Chanel, despite its failure to mention Chanel’s less-than-pleasant past. I hope you like it! Audrey Tautou is a wonderful actress and I think she played an excellent young Coco. The whole film was very well-cast, in my humble opinion.

Lucy - So good to see you back floating around the blogosphere after your crazy week of birthdays! :) Thanks for stopping by, I always love reading your friendly comments. Leslie and I were just discussing over pizza the other night women throughout history who became essentially high class courtesans (sans the title) in order to survive, versus those who did this in order to advance themselves monetarily and in social stature. We thought Josephine was a good example of someone who was truly a survivor—she used her relationships with men literally to survive and to support her family. To the contrary, I think Chanel was someone who took advantage of the terrible times her country was facing in order to advance her societal and financial interests (the part where she tried to use the Nazi laws to kick out her Jewish business partner is particularly disturbing to me). That being said, I still think she made some beautiful clothes and that it was women like her who set the bar for later day feminists and women’s rights activists. To think that before there was Coco Chanel, people gawked at the idea of women wearing trousers!

Robinbird said...

Wow! What an interesting post!! Loved reading it!

I have a little award for you over at my blog! :)

http://almostcrazymommy.blogspot.com/2009/11/my-second-award.html

lizzy J said...

This is another topic that has flown under my radar. I am shocked that Coco was involved this much in the war. After reading this and everyones interesting comments I would have to agree that she was lacking in moral fiber.

Ingrid Mida said...

Hi Allie,
You are the winner of the Dior book giveaway. Please stop by my blog to claim your prize.

Allie ~ Hist-Fic Chick said...

Robinbird - Glad you enjoyed reading this! And thanks so much for the award! I've never won this one before :)

Lizzy, thanks for stopping by :) I found this info shocking when I first read the Chanel bio, too. But then again, a lot of big name artists and celebrities were Anti-Semites back then. It was pretty much the norm for the times, which is very unfortunate, but the ugly truth. My grandpa graduated with a Master's Degree from The Wharton School of Business (U Penn) in the year 1940, and he couldn't even get so much as an interview at a respectable firm simply because his last name sounded Jewish.

Ingrid, THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!! I am so excited...What a fab win! Can't wait to read it :)

Shona said...

I am so ashamed that I had no background knowledge about Coco Chanel before reading ur post.

If a movie is showcasing a person's life , they need to give us a full disclosure not just the positive part or else ur just cheating the audience. Sensible cinema means putting facts in front of the audience and letting them decide what they need to make of it.

Thanks for this post.

dolleygurl said...

I always love the topics you talk about on here. I have an award for you http://themaidenscourt.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-award.html !

Jenny Girl said...

I had no idea. Thank you very much for your through research and even writing on the topic. You present the facts and leave us to decide.

Chanel was definitely a money grubber, in any way she could. I'm sure she is in that special Circle of Hell.

Thank you for a brilliant post.

Melissa Marsh said...

Superb analysis of Coco Chanel. She reminds me of Leni Riefenstahl, the German filmmaker who made "Triumph of the Will" and other Nazi propaganda films. She liked to claim that she did what she did to survive, but I don't buy it.

Thanks for this article! Very well done.

Allie ~ Hist-Fic Chick said...

Shona, A lot of critics would wholeheartedly agree with your assessment of what a biopic ought to be! And no worries, I have found that a lot of people, even in the fashion industry, really don't know much about Chanel's history with the Nazis unless they were around during the war. I didn't until I read the Charles-Roux bio. It's surprising, but the again, so many people used the "but the Nazis made me"..."but I would have lost my job if I didn't obey" line in order to excuse themselves for their actions on the continent during WWII.

dolleygurl, I'm so glad to hear you like my little op/ed discussions I post on here. In my college Journalism class, I always loved creating editorial pieces the most. I don't think I could ever really be an objective reporter; I always would feel the need to interject my two-cents on the subject! Thank you so much for the award!! And congrats to you for receiving it in the first place! :)

Jenny Girl, Your comment really just made my day! You have no idea how happy it makes me to hear that others enjoy reading my posts, especially subjects I'm particularly passionate about, such as controversial women throughout history!

Melissa, Wow, it does sound like Leni and Coco had a lot in common. They both seemed to follow the notion of "Seize the day!"...Even when that day is a dark one! What disgusted me the most by Chanel's actions was her willingness to actually take advantage of the pro-Aryan laws banning Jews from owning businesses. Leni took advantage of the times in order to spread her propaganda films and further her own career. I think Leni Riefenstahl was also an opportunist, definitely not a survivor, as she and Chanel both claimed to be. Thanks for sharing your insight on this topic! :)